Post Pic

NFL Asked to Drop “The Who” From Super Bowl Halftime Show

 

Child Abuse Watch is requesting the NFL remove guitarist Pete Townshend from the lineup due to his 2003 arrest for accessing child pornography on his computer.

Spinner.com is reporting that The Who may be forcedĀ  to drop out of the Super Bowl Halftime Show, due to pressure being put on the NFL by Child Abuse Watch.

From Spinner.com:

“A child abuse prevention group in the U.K. is protesting against British rock icons The Who’s appearance at the NFL’s Super Bowl XLIV halftime show on February 7. Child Abuse Watch is requesting the NFL remove guitarist Pete Townshend from the lineup due to his 2003 arrest for accessing child pornography on his computer.

Child Abuse Watch founder and CEO Evin Daly told the press, “The Who is a great band. Pete Townshend is the only issue here.”

Townshend, pictured, was given a police warning following the charges and put on the U.K.’s Violent and Sex Offender Register for five years. Townshend contends that he purchased access to a Texas-based pedophile website as part of research for his autobiography, which was published in 2008. He was also booked for possession of “indecent pictures,” but was cleared of those charges, as no pictures were found on his computer.

Child Abuse Watch published a position statement on Townshend’s halftime show appearance, which, if Super Bowl XLIII’s ratings are any indication, could be watched by upwards of 100 million people. It also wrote a letter to the NFL on the matter. On its website, the organization writes that the musician “pleaded guilty” and “was never cleared of any charges pertaining to his caution and resulting sex offender status.” The statement also highlights an article Townshend wrote on child pornography as proof of his research and a graphic fictional story he published to his website in 2006. The story was quickly taken down, with Townshend admitting it was “ill-advised.”

NFL spokesperson Brian McCarthy insists that the band will perform as scheduled. “UK police cleared him since he was doing research for a project on child abuse,” he said.

  • Robert Martin
    He acknowledged a single credit card access in 1999 to the Landslide website alleged to advertise child pornography. He say's he was doing so for research for an anti-child porn book, obviously now since abandoned. (He's long been involved in child charities).

    As a result, his computers were seized, and after 4 months the cops realised there was no child porn on them.

    Due to this he was only cautioned. By accepting a caution however, he was automatically put on the sex offenders register.

    Later it was found out that he was in fact falsely accused in the first place, and had accepted a caution foolishly, under pressure from the high profile police/media operation. Who knows what was going through his head.

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2007/apr/1...

    Guardian: "Operation Ore flawed by fraud - The high-profile crackdown on internet child porn has claimed lives and destroyed reputations. But fresh evidence says the police got it wrong, says Duncan Campbell"

    "thousands of cases under Operation Ore have been built on the shakiest of foundation: In many cases, the card details were stolen; the sites contained nothing or legal material only; and the people who allegedly signed up to visit the sites never went there; 39 men have killed themselves under the pressure of the investigations"

    Seriously, use google.
blog comments powered by Disqus
Learn More About Advertising Here
           
Let The News Come To You / Pick One Or All

Enter your email address: